ISO 9001 Standards Certification

ISO 9001 Standards Certification

When an organization chooses not to pursue ISO 9001 certification or not to retain the ISO 9001 certificate, it should make no difference to the way the organization is managed. It’s similar to the man who chooses not to take the course examination. He still has the knowledge he has acquired whether or not he takes the exam and gets a certificate. What he cannot do is demonstrate to others that he has reached a certain level of education without having to prove it every time. People who know him don’t care that he didn’t take the exam. It is only those who don’t know him that he will have difficulty convincing.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING ISO 9001 IN SMEs

There are many issues that must be addressed in moving the QMS from the initial state to the desired state. For example, all organizations implementing ISO 9001 will need to consider the unique culture within the organization, its size, and the resources available. Beyond those widely discussed points, three issues that merit particular attention are (1) consideration of the QMS as a parallel function, (2) training, and (3) auditing. Key points associated with these issues are discussed below.

In the case of all of the transitions depicted, real benefits from the QMS are more

likely to be experienced if the QMS is implemented directly into the core structure of the organization. SMEs must be cautious against establishing a QMS that is run separately in parallel to its other systems. In SMEs, the parallel subsystem most commonly exhibits itself as a separate Quality Assurance, or in some cases, ISO 9001 department. Possible reasons for this may include the existence of rigid departmental boundaries in some SMEs or overemphasis on core activities. As Yauch and Steudel [10] note, SMEs tend to focus their attention on “…necessary routine activities (such as sales, production, shipping, etc.) rather than activities aimed at improving processes or systems.” If a SME insists on establishing a separate quality department, its level of effectiveness can be increased by embedding the QMS in widely-used organizational systems where practical. The integration is largely a function of how well the QMS manages to share information with other subsystems and its ability to align with the policies, norms, goals, and values in place throughout the organization.

In SMEs, training and staff development is more likely to be ad hoc and small scale because of modest human and financial resources and the absence of a specific training budget. To prevent the problems arising from lack of education and training, two things must be done:

1. Education of Top Management: The centralization of decision-making processes within many SMEs means that the management can either be the main stumbling block to change or the main catalyst for change. Therefore, any approach to ISO 9001 implementation must involve considerable education for the top management of the organization to create awareness and understanding of the implementation process as a change initiative. Implementing a fully functional and documented QMS requires motivation by top management to appreciate, achieve, and implement the necessary measures to meet the standards’ criteria.

2. Education and Training of Employees: SMEs are often under pressure to quickly gain ISO 9001 registration. Meeting the requirements of the standard in a short period of time can prove a formidable obstacle for a small company. Since most SMEs do not possess the needed expertise internally, they may be inclined to hire external experts to provide the necessary technical expertise and manpower. However, having a functioning and documented QMS requires more than that. It requires ensuring that all employees in the organization clearly know what is expected of them and how they can contribute to the attainment of their organizations’ goals. This will likely require the preparation and implementation of a training plan tailored specifically to the unique characteristics and maturity level of the SME.

As emphasized throughout the paper, a QMS is not going to produce the expected results unless it is fully functional. While auditing must therefore verify the existence of the necessary documentation, it must also focus on the functionality of the QMS. The measurement of the functionality and the qualitative and financial impacts of a QMS have been the subject of several studies, including Kaynak. Among the categories used to measure functionality and performance improvement, two are particularly noteworthy for our purposes: management commitment and employee involvement. A QMS cannot be functional in the absence of those two characteristics. Therefore, as a minimum, internal and external auditors should continually verify top management’s commitment to increased company-wide quality awareness and improvement in addition to employee involvement in the design, implementation, operation, and improvement of quality related processes and procedures.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING ISO 9001 IN SMEs

There are many issues that must be addressed in moving the QMS from the initial state to the desired state. For example, all organizations implementing ISO 9001 will need to consider the unique culture within the organization, its size, and the resources available. Beyond those widely discussed points, three issues that merit particular attention are (1) consideration of the QMS as a parallel function, (2) training, and (3) auditing. Key points associated with these issues are discussed below.

In the case of all of the transitions depicted, real benefits from the QMS are more

likely to be experienced if the QMS is implemented directly into the core structure of the organization. SMEs must be cautious against establishing a QMS that is run separately in parallel to its other systems. In SMEs, the parallel subsystem most commonly exhibits itself as a separate Quality Assurance, or in some cases, ISO 9001 department. Possible reasons for this may include the existence of rigid departmental boundaries in some SMEs or overemphasis on core activities. As Yauch and Steudel [10] note, SMEs tend to focus their attention on “…necessary routine activities (such as sales, production, shipping, etc.) rather than activities aimed at improving processes or systems.” If a SME insists on establishing a separate quality department, its level of effectiveness can be increased by embedding the QMS in widely-used organizational systems where practical. The integration is largely a function of how well the QMS manages to share information with other subsystems and its ability to align with the policies, norms, goals, and values in place throughout the organization.

In SMEs, training and staff development is more likely to be ad hoc and small scale because of modest human and financial resources and the absence of a specific training budget. To prevent the problems arising from lack of education and training, two things must be done:

1. Education of Top Management: The centralization of decision-making processes within many SMEs means that the management can either be the main stumbling block to change or the main catalyst for change. Therefore, any approach to ISO 9001 implementation must involve considerable education for the top management of the organization to create awareness and understanding of the implementation process as a change initiative. Implementing a fully functional and documented QMS requires motivation by top management to appreciate, achieve, and implement the necessary measures to meet the standards’ criteria.

2. Education and Training of Employees: SMEs are often under pressure to quickly gain ISO 9001 registration. Meeting the requirements of the standard in a short period of time can prove a formidable obstacle for a small company. Since most SMEs do not possess the needed expertise internally, they may be inclined to hire external experts to provide the necessary technical expertise and manpower. However, having a functioning and documented QMS requires more than that. It requires ensuring that all employees in the organization clearly know what is expected of them and how they can contribute to the attainment of their organizations’ goals. This will likely require the preparation and implementation of a training plan tailored specifically to the unique characteristics and maturity level of the SME.

As emphasized throughout the paper, a QMS is not going to produce the expected results unless it is fully functional. While auditing must therefore verify the existence of the necessary documentation, it must also focus on the functionality of the QMS. The measurement of the functionality and the qualitative and financial impacts of a QMS have been the subject of several studies, including Kaynak. Among the categories used to measure functionality and performance improvement, two are particularly noteworthy for our purposes: management commitment and employee involvement. A QMS cannot be functional in the absence of those two characteristics. Therefore, as a minimum, internal and external auditors should continually verify top management’s commitment to increased company-wide quality awareness and improvement in addition to employee involvement in the design, implementation, operation, and improvement of quality related processes and procedures.

ISO 9001 Standards Document control procedures

ISO 9001 Standards Document control procedures
The ISO 9001 Standards requires that a documented procedure be established to define the controls needed.

This requirement means that the methods for performing the various activities required to control different types of documents should be defined and documented.

Although the ISO 9001 standards implies that a single procedure is required, should you choose to produce several different procedures for handling the different types of documents it is doubtful that any auditor would deem this noncompliant. Where this might be questionable is in cases where there is no logical reason for such differences and where merging the procedures and settling on a best practice would improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Documents are recorded information and the purpose of the document control process is to firstly ensure the appropriate information is available where needed and secondly to prevent the inadvertent use of invalid
information. At each stage of the process are activities to be performed that may require documented procedures in order to ensure consistency and predictability. Procedures may not be necessary for each stage in the process.

ISO 9001 Standards Document control procedures

ISO 9001 Standards Document control procedures
The ISO 9001 Standards requires that a documented procedure be established to define the controls needed.

This requirement means that the methods for performing the various activities required to control different types of documents should be defined and documented.

Although the ISO 9001 standards implies that a single procedure is required, should you choose to produce several different procedures for handling the different types of documents it is doubtful that any auditor would deem this noncompliant. Where this might be questionable is in cases where there is no logical reason for such differences and where merging the procedures and settling on a best practice would improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Documents are recorded information and the purpose of the document control process is to firstly ensure the appropriate information is available where needed and secondly to prevent the inadvertent use of invalid
information. At each stage of the process are activities to be performed that may require documented procedures in order to ensure consistency and predictability. Procedures may not be necessary for each stage in the process.

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

A ISO 9001 Standards quality policy and its corresponding quality objectives are established to direct the organization towards two specific goals of a quality management system:

-Provision of products – goods and services – that meet customer and applicable legal requirements, and

- Enhancement of customer satisfaction

The quality policy and the objectives are also a means of controlling the quality management system’s processes. Simply, if you want to control a process, assign an objective to it (or more) and make sure it is aligned to the quality policy, then monitor and measure the process’ performance against the assigned objective. You need to provide adequate resources to the process to ensure that it is capable of achieving the objective. You continually improve the whole process by upgrading the objective, make corrective and preventive actions or introduce innovation to it. Corrective action addresses an undesirable situation’s cause in order to prevent its recurrence. Preventive action, by contrast, addresses the probable cause of a potentially undesirable situation. This is what the quality policy and objectives are supposed to do. They provide focus, direction and control.

The quality objectives need to be consistent with the quality policy and the commitment to continual improvement, and their achievement needs to be measurable. The achievement of quality objectives can have a positive impact on product quality, operational effectiveness and financial performance and thus on the satisfaction and confidence of interested parties. When an organization has established a quality policy and a set of operational objectives, this means the only thing left to do is to design or plan the necessary processes or tasks that can realize those objectives. Therefore, the processes determine if the objectives will be met in full, partially or not at all. This is where the ISO 9001 standard play a critical role in specifying the required processes and the operating criteria. This is what ISO 9001 is all about. It even specifies criteria for the policy and the objectives.

A quality policy needs to satisfy the following requirements:

• It is appropriate to the purpose of the organization,
• It includes a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system,
• It provides a framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives,
• It is communicated and understood within the organization, and
• It is reviewed for continuing suitability

Quality objectives must be established in order to enable the organization to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system. Quality objectives must achieve four things:

• Enable the organization to meet customer requirements
• Enable the organization to enhance customer satisfaction
• Enable the organization to comply with all legal requirements applicable to the product
• Continually contribute to the effectiveness of the quality management system

Therefore, when you are in the meeting room with your management brainstorming on the appropriate objectives, have these four points in mind.

ISO 9001:2000 requires that management periodically review changes to both the policy and objectives. An organization’s objectives must be measurable and its processes designed to meet those objectives. An organization’s overall business goals, quality objectives and quality policy are all interrelated and must work together to achieve business improvement. To do this, it’s necessary to understand which processes are key to achieving business goals and align those processes with the quality objectives. It means aligning business goals, quality objectives and process measures to create real improvement. And it means using process mapping. Process mapping involves more than just flow charting. Among other things, it can manage and improve processes by illustrating process measures as well as process flows and interactions. One process-mapping method begins by involving the people who work in the process. Another entails mapping the process as is, taking action to improve it and then preparing a final map of the improved process.

Process owners are directly responsible for the attainment of the objectives. They must be given adequate resources, including competent human resources. They need to review the objectives periodically to ensure the key performance indicators are heading towards their objectives on schedule. If not, they need to initiate corrective actions and if the risks of non-achievement are visible, take preventive actions to control them and steer the KPI’s back on course.

Examples of quality objectives:

• Production rejects <>
• Machine breakdown <>
• Returned products = 0/mth
• Purchasing >95% on-time delivery
• Inventory damage = 0/mth

Conclusion: ISO 9001 requires that the quality management system achieves its objectives in order to realize the quality policy.

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

A ISO 9001 Standards quality policy and its corresponding quality objectives are established to direct the organization towards two specific goals of a quality management system:

-Provision of products – goods and services – that meet customer and applicable legal requirements, and

- Enhancement of customer satisfaction

The quality policy and the objectives are also a means of controlling the quality management system’s processes. Simply, if you want to control a process, assign an objective to it (or more) and make sure it is aligned to the quality policy, then monitor and measure the process’ performance against the assigned objective. You need to provide adequate resources to the process to ensure that it is capable of achieving the objective. You continually improve the whole process by upgrading the objective, make corrective and preventive actions or introduce innovation to it. Corrective action addresses an undesirable situation’s cause in order to prevent its recurrence. Preventive action, by contrast, addresses the probable cause of a potentially undesirable situation. This is what the quality policy and objectives are supposed to do. They provide focus, direction and control.

The quality objectives need to be consistent with the quality policy and the commitment to continual improvement, and their achievement needs to be measurable. The achievement of quality objectives can have a positive impact on product quality, operational effectiveness and financial performance and thus on the satisfaction and confidence of interested parties. When an organization has established a quality policy and a set of operational objectives, this means the only thing left to do is to design or plan the necessary processes or tasks that can realize those objectives. Therefore, the processes determine if the objectives will be met in full, partially or not at all. This is where the ISO 9001 standard play a critical role in specifying the required processes and the operating criteria. This is what ISO 9001 is all about. It even specifies criteria for the policy and the objectives.

A quality policy needs to satisfy the following requirements:

• It is appropriate to the purpose of the organization,
• It includes a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system,
• It provides a framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives,
• It is communicated and understood within the organization, and
• It is reviewed for continuing suitability

Quality objectives must be established in order to enable the organization to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system. Quality objectives must achieve four things:

• Enable the organization to meet customer requirements
• Enable the organization to enhance customer satisfaction
• Enable the organization to comply with all legal requirements applicable to the product
• Continually contribute to the effectiveness of the quality management system

Therefore, when you are in the meeting room with your management brainstorming on the appropriate objectives, have these four points in mind.

ISO 9001:2000 requires that management periodically review changes to both the policy and objectives. An organization’s objectives must be measurable and its processes designed to meet those objectives. An organization’s overall business goals, quality objectives and quality policy are all interrelated and must work together to achieve business improvement. To do this, it’s necessary to understand which processes are key to achieving business goals and align those processes with the quality objectives. It means aligning business goals, quality objectives and process measures to create real improvement. And it means using process mapping. Process mapping involves more than just flow charting. Among other things, it can manage and improve processes by illustrating process measures as well as process flows and interactions. One process-mapping method begins by involving the people who work in the process. Another entails mapping the process as is, taking action to improve it and then preparing a final map of the improved process.

Process owners are directly responsible for the attainment of the objectives. They must be given adequate resources, including competent human resources. They need to review the objectives periodically to ensure the key performance indicators are heading towards their objectives on schedule. If not, they need to initiate corrective actions and if the risks of non-achievement are visible, take preventive actions to control them and steer the KPI’s back on course.

Examples of quality objectives:

• Production rejects <>
• Machine breakdown <>
• Returned products = 0/mth
• Purchasing >95% on-time delivery
• Inventory damage = 0/mth

Conclusion: ISO 9001 requires that the quality management system achieves its objectives in order to realize the quality policy.